Who still has access?

Background

A growing business had worked with multiple employees, vendors, freelancers, consultants, and external IT providers over several years.

‍

As the company expanded, new systems, cloud platforms, email accounts, shared drives, and operational tools were continuously added across the environment.

‍

From management’s perspective, everything appeared to be functioning normally day to day.

‍

The situation

Over time, administrative access, permissions, shared credentials, and vendor accounts had accumulated across multiple systems without any centralized review.

‍

Different people had been granted access at different stages of the business:

• former employees
• external support providers
• marketing vendors
• developers
• freelancers
• operational staff who had changed roles internally

‍

In several cases, management could no longer clearly answer:

• who still had access
• which accounts had administrative control
• who owned specific systems
• or how many external parties still remained connected to critical parts of the environment

The company had gradually lost operational clarity around its own access environment.

‍

What wasn’t immediately visible

The issue was not caused by one major security event.

‍

The problem had formed gradually over time through growth, staff changes, vendor involvement, rushed operational decisions, and years of access being added without structured cleanup.

‍

Several systems still depended on:

• old employee accounts
• shared credentials
• external administrative access
• and recovery methods no longer controlled directly by the business

Leadership initially believed the environment was “managed,” but in reality there was no complete internal picture of who still controlled what across the company.

‍

The risk

If the environment had continued operating in the same direction, the company risked:

• unauthorized access to sensitive systems and data
• operational disruption if accounts became inaccessible
• loss of ownership over critical platforms
• security exposure through forgotten vendor access
• and major difficulty responding to future incidents or internal changes

The larger issue was that the company itself no longer had full operational confidence in its own environment.

‍

What we did

We reviewed the environment across:

• systems
• accounts
• administrative access
• vendor permissions
• recovery methods
• ownership structures
• and operational dependencies

‍

This included:

• identifying who still had active access
• reviewing unnecessary administrative permissions
• clarifying ownership across platforms
• separating business-critical systems from legacy access
• and helping management rebuild a clearer internal access structure

‍

The focus was not only security.

It was helping the business regain operational control over its own environment.

‍

Outcome & business impact

The company regained much clearer understanding of:

• who had access
• who controlled critical systems
• which vendors still remained connected
• and where operational ownership had weakened over time

Unnecessary access was removed, administrative ownership was clarified, and the environment became significantly easier to manage operationally moving forward.

‍

Most importantly, the business regained confidence back that they are in control of the environment.

‍